写作
评测
筛选文章 评测
评测
第 2 页 · 12 / 64-
2026-09-26 至 09-27|AI Agent 工程阅读清单 5 条 Agent 工程更新,重点看 Tool 与 Skill 上下文预算、context doctor、持久调度、Tool Loop 预算和 fail-closed 审批。
-
AI Agent engineering reading list, Sep 26–27, 2026 Five updates on tool and skill context budgets, context doctor, persistent scheduling, tool-loop limits, and fail-closed approvals.
-
Why old CLAUDE.md rules can hinder a model upgrade Use prompt audits, instruction layers, and migration evals to retain real requirements, reassess model workarounds, and enforce hard limits in code.
-
模型升级后,旧 CLAUDE.md 为什么可能拖后腿 拆解 Prompt Audit、指令分层和迁移 Eval:模型能力变化后,哪些规则应保留,哪些模型补丁要重新验收,哪些限制必须下沉到 Hook 或策略层。
-
AI Agent engineering reading list, Sep 25–26, 2026 Seven updates on token efficiency, Codex networking, Copilot Memory, local agent server security, self-practice, skills, and reproducibility.
-
2026-09-25 至 09-26|AI Agent 工程阅读清单 7 条 AI Agent 工程更新,覆盖长任务 Token 优化、Codex 网络策略、Copilot Memory、本地 Agent Server 安全和 Self-Practice。
-
AI agent engineering reading list | 2026-09-24 to 09-25 Five updates on proactive safety intervention timing, state revision, TeamHarness, enterprise MCP permissions, and tool-result handling.
-
2026-09-24 至 09-25|AI Agent 工程阅读清单 5 条 AI Agent 工程更新,重点看主动安全介入时机、状态修正、TeamHarness、企业 MCP 权限边界和 Tool 结果处理。
-
Agent markets: 85% of the loss comes before negotiation Anthropic's book market experiment locates most efficiency loss in preference representation. A look at model choice, preference evals, and market rules.
-
Anthropic Agent 市场:85% 的效率损失发生在谈判前 Anthropic 的 Agent 市场实验显示,主要效率损失发生在偏好表示和匹配阶段。本文拆解模型选择、偏好 Eval 与市场规则。
-
GitHub Security Lab makes fuzzing an agent feedback loop GitHub Security Lab Fuzzing Taskflow uses coverage gaps to guide model decisions while deterministic tools execute, measure, and persist results.
-
GitHub Security Lab 把 Fuzzing 做成 Agent 反馈环 拆解 GitHub Security Lab 的 Fuzzing Taskflow,模型根据 coverage 缺口决定下一轮,确定性工具继续负责执行、测量与持久化。